Automatic differentiation platform : design
ESAIM: Modélisation mathématique et analyse numérique, Special issue on Programming, Tome 36 (2002) no. 5, pp. 783-792.

Automatic differentiation (AD) has proven its interest in many fields of applied mathematics, but it is still not widely used. Furthermore, existing numerical methods have been developed under the hypotheses that computing program derivatives is not affordable for real size problems. Exact derivatives have therefore been avoided, or replaced by approximations computed by divided differences. The hypotheses is no longer true due to the maturity of AD added to the quick evolution of machine capacity. This encourages the development of new numerical methods that freely make use of program derivatives, and will require the definition and development of new AD strategies. AD tools must be extended to produce these new derivative programs, in such a modular way that the different sub-problems can be solved independently from one another. Flexibility assures the user to be able to generate whatever specific derivative program he needs, with at the same time the possibility to generate standard ones. This paper sketches a new model of modular, extensible and flexible AD tool that will increase tenfold the DA potential for applied mathematics. In this model, the AD tool consists of an AD kernel named KAD supported by a general program transformation platform.

DOI : 10.1051/m2an:2002042
Classification : 65Y20, 26B05
Mots-clés : AD, algorithmic differentiation, computational differentiation, design, open platform 
@article{M2AN_2002__36_5_783_0,
     author = {Faure, Christ\`ele},
     title = {Automatic differentiation platform : design},
     journal = {ESAIM: Mod\'elisation math\'ematique et analyse num\'erique},
     pages = {783--792},
     publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
     volume = {36},
     number = {5},
     year = {2002},
     doi = {10.1051/m2an:2002042},
     zbl = {1024.65020},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/m2an:2002042/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Faure, Christèle
TI  - Automatic differentiation platform : design
JO  - ESAIM: Modélisation mathématique et analyse numérique
PY  - 2002
SP  - 783
EP  - 792
VL  - 36
IS  - 5
PB  - EDP-Sciences
UR  - http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/m2an:2002042/
DO  - 10.1051/m2an:2002042
LA  - en
ID  - M2AN_2002__36_5_783_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Faure, Christèle
%T Automatic differentiation platform : design
%J ESAIM: Modélisation mathématique et analyse numérique
%D 2002
%P 783-792
%V 36
%N 5
%I EDP-Sciences
%U http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/m2an:2002042/
%R 10.1051/m2an:2002042
%G en
%F M2AN_2002__36_5_783_0
Faure, Christèle. Automatic differentiation platform : design. ESAIM: Modélisation mathématique et analyse numérique, Special issue on Programming, Tome 36 (2002) no. 5, pp. 783-792. doi : 10.1051/m2an:2002042. http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/m2an:2002042/

[1] M. Berz, C.H. Bischof, G.F. Corliss and A. Griewank, Computational Differentiation: Applications, Techniques, and Tools. SIAM, Philadelphia (1996). | MR | Zbl

[2] C. Bischof, A. Carle, P. Khademi, A. Mauer and P. Hovland, Adifor 2.0 User's Guide, Technical Report ANL/MCS-TM-192/CRPC-TR95516-S. Argonne National Laboratory Technical Memorandum and CRPC Technical Report (1998).

[3] G. Corliss, C. Faure, A. Griewank, L. Hascoet and U. Naumann, Automatic Differentiation: From Simulation to Optimization. Springer-Verlag (2001).

[4] C. Faure, Adjoining strategies for multi-layered programs. Optim. Methods Softw. 17 (2002) 129-164. | Zbl

[5] C. Faure and U. Naumann, Minimizing the Tape Size, in Automatic Differentiation: From Simulation to Optimization, G. Corliss, C. Faure, A. Griewank, L. Hascoët and U. Naumann Eds. Springer-Verlag (2001).

[6] C. Faure and Y. Papegay, Odyssée User's Guide, Version 1.7. Rapport technique 0224. INRIA (1998).

[7] R. Giering, Tangent linear and Adjoint Model Compiler, Users manual (1997). Unpublished, available from http://puddle.mit.edu/∼ralf/tamc

[8] R. Giering and T. Kaminski, Generating recomputations in reverse mode, in Automatic Differentiation of Algorithms: From Simulation to Optimization. Springer-Verlag (2001).

[9] A. Griewank, Principles and Techniques of Algorithmic Differentiation. SIAM (2000). | MR | Zbl

[10] A. Griewank and G.F. Corliss, Automatic Differentiation of Algorithms: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. SIAM, Philadelphia (1991). | MR | Zbl

[11] Stanford Compiler Group, Suif Compiler System, Technical report. Stanford University.

[12] M. Iri, Simultaneous computation of functions, partial derivatives and estimates of rounding errors, complexity and practicality. Japan J. Appl. Math. 1 (1984) 223-252. | Zbl

[13] M. Iri and K. Kubota, Methods of fast automatic differentiation and applications, Research memorandum rmi 87-02, Department of Mathematical Engineering and Instrumentation Physics. Faculty of Engineering, University of Tokyo (1987).

[14] J. Joss, Algorithmisches Differenzieren. Ph.D. Thesis, ETH Zurich (1976).

[15] K.V. Kim, Yu.E. Nesterov and B.V. Cherkasskiĭ, An estimate of the effort in computing the gradient. Soviet Math. Dokl. 29 (1984) 384-387. | Zbl

[16] G.M. Ostrovskii, Yu.M. Volin and W.W. Borisov, Uber die berechnung von ableitungen. Wiss. Z. Tech. Hochsch. Chimie 13 (1971) 382-384. | Zbl

[17] J.W. Sawyer, First partial differentiation by computer with an application to categorial data analysis. Amer. Statist. 38 (1984) 300-308. | Zbl

[18] B. Speelpening, Compiling fast partial derivatives of functions given by algorithms. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (1980).

Cité par Sources :