We investigate pricing decisions and information value in two competing supply chains, each consisting of one manufacturer and one retailer. Both retailers are engaged in Bertrand retail competition and are endowed with the private information on the disrupted demand. Three information sharing scenarios have been considered, i.e., information sharing in both chains, information sharing in only one chain, and information sharing in neither chain. For each information scenario, there always exists robustness for each manufacturer’s production plan. That is, when the disrupted amount of the market demand is sufficiently small, the manufacturer’s production plan or the retailer’s order quantity will be unchanged. Meanwhile, we also study the information value by comparing these three information scenarios, and find that the information value not only works in one chain directly, but also does in the competing chain indirectly. Through comparative analysis, we find that the retailer is reluctant to share his private information on the disrupted demand with his partner because of the fear of information leakage. Meanwhile, the performance of the whole chain may become worse off if the information of disrupted demand is shared in this chain.
Accepté le :
DOI : 10.1051/ro/2016062
Mots-clés : Supply chain competition, information sharing, game theory, disruption management, robustness
@article{RO_2017__51_3_779_0,
author = {Chen, Kebing and Feng, Meiling and Yang, Lei},
title = {Information sharing for competing supply chains with demand disruption},
journal = {RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Op\'erationnelle},
pages = {779--804},
publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
volume = {51},
number = {3},
year = {2017},
doi = {10.1051/ro/2016062},
mrnumber = {3880525},
zbl = {1384.90012},
language = {en},
url = {http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2016062/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Chen, Kebing AU - Feng, Meiling AU - Yang, Lei TI - Information sharing for competing supply chains with demand disruption JO - RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle PY - 2017 SP - 779 EP - 804 VL - 51 IS - 3 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2016062/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2016062 LA - en ID - RO_2017__51_3_779_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Chen, Kebing %A Feng, Meiling %A Yang, Lei %T Information sharing for competing supply chains with demand disruption %J RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle %D 2017 %P 779-804 %V 51 %N 3 %I EDP-Sciences %U http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2016062/ %R 10.1051/ro/2016062 %G en %F RO_2017__51_3_779_0
Chen, Kebing; Feng, Meiling; Yang, Lei. Information sharing for competing supply chains with demand disruption. RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 51 (2017) no. 3, pp. 779-804. doi : 10.1051/ro/2016062. http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2016062/
, Perspectives in supply chain risk management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 103 (2006) 451–488. | DOI
and , Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Prod. Oper. Manag. 14 (2005) 53–68. | DOI
A. Latour, Trial by fire: a blaze in Albuquerque sets off major crisis for cell-phone giants. Wall Street Journal 29 (2001).
G. Yu and X.T. Qi, Disruption management: framework, models, and applications. World Scientific Publisher, Singapore (2004). | MR | Zbl
, and , Competition and disruption in a dynamic urban supply chain. Trans. Res. B: Methodological 45 (2011) 1212–1231. | DOI
, and , Designing supply contracts: contract type and information asymmetry. Manag. Sci. 50 (2004) 550–559. | DOI | Zbl
, Auctioning supply contracts. Manag. Sci. 53 (2007) 1562–1576. | DOI | Zbl
, , and , Contracting and coordination under asymmetric production cost information. Prod. Oper. Manag. 21 (2012) 345–360. | DOI
, , and , Supply disruptions, asymmetric information, and a backup production option. Manag. Sci. 55 (2009) 192–209. | DOI | Zbl
, and , Optimal procurement design of an assembly supply chain with information asymmetry. Prod. Oper. Manag. 23 (2014) 2075–2088. | DOI
and , Supply chain sourcing under asymmetric information. Prod. Oper. Manag. 20 (2011) 92–115. | DOI
and , Purchasing under asymmetric demand and cost information: when is more private information detter? Oper. Res. 59 (2011) 914–928. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , and , Contracting with asymmetric cost information in a dual-channel supply chain. Oper. Res. Lett. 41 (2013) 410–414. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and , Analysis of a dual-sourcing service provision game with symmetric and asymmetric vendors. Appl. Math. Model. 35 (2011) 3998–4007. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , and , Contracting with asymmetric demand information in supply chains. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 217 (2012) 333–341. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and , Commitment-penalty contracts in drop-shipping supply chains with asymmetric demand information. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 204 (2010) 449–462. | DOI | Zbl
, , and , Sharing forecast information in a long-term supply chain relationship: the role of customer review strategy. Oper. Res. 58 (2010) 81–93. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and , Spatial price equilibrium with information asymmetry in quality and minimum quality standards. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 158 (2014) 300–313. | DOI
, and , Information and inventory in distribution channels. Manag. Sci. 53 (2007) 1551–1561. | DOI | Zbl
and , A bargaining model for first-time interaction under asymmetric beliefs of supply reliability. Manag. Sci. 52 (2006) 865–880. | DOI | Zbl
, and , Manufacturer–retailer contracting with asymmetric information on retailer’s degree of loss aversion. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 142 (2013) 372–380. | DOI
and , Repeated games with asymmetric information modeling financial markets with two risky assets. RAIRO: OR 47 (2013) 251–272. | DOI | Numdam | MR | Zbl
and , Reducing the cost of untimely supply chain delivery performance for asymmetric Laplace distributed delivery. Appl. Math. Model. 39 (2015) 3758–3770. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and , Information sharing in a supply chain. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 20 (2000) 373–387. | DOI
and , An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Marketing Sci. 2 (1983) 161–191. | DOI
and , Supply chain coordination in a market with customer service competition. Prod. Oper. Manag. 13 (2004) 3–22. | DOI
, , and , Competition among supply chains: implications of full returns policy. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 139 (2012) 257–265. | DOI
and , Multiperiod supply chain network equilibrium model with electronic commerce and multicriteria decision-making. RAIRO: OR 46 (2012) 253–287. | DOI | Numdam | MR | Zbl
, and , Quality improvement in competing supply chains. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 134 (2011) 262–270. | DOI
, and , Advertising in asymmetric competing supply chains. Prod. Oper. Manag. 23 (2014) 1845–1858. | DOI
and , Competition and structure in serial supply chains with deterministic demand. Manag. Sci. 47 (2001) 966–978. | DOI | Zbl
, Competition of two green and regular supply chains under environmental protection and revenue seeking policies of government. Comput. Industrial Eng. 82 (2015) 103–114. | DOI
, and , Information structures and pricing decisions in competing supply chains. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 21 (2012) 226–254. | DOI
, and , Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 218 (2012) 602–613. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and , Contracting and information sharing under supply chain competition. Manag. Sci. 54 (2008) 701–715. | DOI | Zbl
, and , Sharing imperfect demand information in competing supply chains with production diseconomies. Manag. Sci. 57 (2011) 566–581. | DOI | Zbl
and , Managing risk to avoid supply chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 46 (2004) 53–61.
, and , Proactive planning for catastrophic events in supply chains. J. Oper. Manag. 27 (2009) 141–153. | DOI
, , and . Disruption management-operation research between planning and execution. OR/MS Today 28 (2001) 40–43.
, and , Disruption management in production planning. Naval Research Logistics 52 (2005) 420–442. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and , Sharing demand and supply risk in a supply chain. IIE Trans. 43 (2011) 451–469. | DOI
and , Modeling supplier selection and the use of option contracts for global supply chain design. Comput. Oper. Res. 36 (2009) 2786–2800. | DOI | Zbl
and , Analysis of production-inventory system for deteriorating items with demand disruption. Int. J. Prod. Res. 50 (2012) 4580–4592. | DOI
and , Demand disruption and coordination of the supply chain with a dominant retailer. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 197 (2009) 225–234. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , and , Performance evaluation of supply chain networks with assembly structure under system disruptions. Comput. Oper. Res. 39 (2012) 3229–3243. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and , Coordination of supply chain after demand disruptions when retailers compete. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 109 (2007) 162–179. | DOI
, and , Competition and cooperation in a single-retailer two-supplier supply chain with supply disruption. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 124 (2010) 137–150. | DOI
, and , Pricing and production decisions in dual-channel supply chains with demand disruptions. Comput. Ind. Eng. 62 (2012) 70–83. | DOI
and , Price competition, cost and demand disruptions and coordination of a supply chain with one manufacturer and two competing retailers. Omega 36 (2008) 741–753. | DOI
M. Bundschuh, D. Klabjan and D.L. Thurston, Modeling robust and reliable supply chains. Optimization Online e-print. www.optimization-online.org (2003).
and , Robust and reliable forward–reverse logistics network design under demand uncertainty and facility disruptions. Appl. Math. Model. 38 (2014) 2630–2647. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and , An analysis of supply chain decisions with asymmetrical retailers: effects of disruptions and static service cost on coordination mechanism. RAIRO: OR 46 (2012) 159–187. | DOI | Numdam | Zbl
Q. Qiang, A. Nagurney and J. Dong, Modeling of supply chain risk under disruptions with performance measurement and robustness analysis.Managing Supply Chain Risk and Vulnerability. Springer (2009) 91–111.
, and , Supply chain contracts under demand and cost disruptions with asymmetric information. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 139 (2012) 116–126. | DOI
and , Supply chain contracting with competing suppliers under asymmetric information. IIE Trans. 45 (2013) 25–52. | DOI
Cité par Sources :
