The contextual variable is an important issue that makes an indispensable impact on the productivities of decision making units (DMUs). Analyzing the contribution of such factors to productivity differences is an intriguing area of research in data envelopment analysis (DEA). We first investigate whether and how contextual variables impact performances of the DMUs based on slack-based measurement. We extend the implicit assumption of prior studies and suggest that contextual variables can be a catalyst to increase the productivity. Impact and error factors, which are derived from regression analysis and stochastic frontier analysis (SFA), are defined to better represent the composition of two contradictory impacts, catalyst and depressant, of contextual variables. A statistical analysis is provided to identify the significance of such impacts and recognize multi-collinearity among contextual variables. The two factors are also moderated flexibly by decision makers in accordance with various production scenarios. Accordingly, original inputs and outputs are appropriately adjusted. Further, modified slack-based DEA models are proposed to incorporate DEA and regression analysis within an integrated framework. Several properties and propositions are presented to better describe the characteristics of the models. An empirical example is shown to verify the feasibility of the proposed approach.
Mots-clés : Data envelopment analysis, contextual variable, slack-based approach, productivity, stochastic frontier analysis
@article{RO_2017__51_4_903_0, author = {zhao, Linlin and hu, Zhangchen and wang, Jun and zhuang, Yuliang}, title = {Estimating the impact of contextual variables on the productivity: {An} enhanced slack-based {DEA} model}, journal = {RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Op\'erationnelle}, pages = {903--920}, publisher = {EDP-Sciences}, volume = {51}, number = {4}, year = {2017}, doi = {10.1051/ro/2016063}, mrnumber = {3783926}, zbl = {1400.90205}, language = {en}, url = {http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2016063/} }
TY - JOUR AU - zhao, Linlin AU - hu, Zhangchen AU - wang, Jun AU - zhuang, Yuliang TI - Estimating the impact of contextual variables on the productivity: An enhanced slack-based DEA model JO - RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle PY - 2017 SP - 903 EP - 920 VL - 51 IS - 4 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2016063/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2016063 LA - en ID - RO_2017__51_4_903_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A zhao, Linlin %A hu, Zhangchen %A wang, Jun %A zhuang, Yuliang %T Estimating the impact of contextual variables on the productivity: An enhanced slack-based DEA model %J RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle %D 2017 %P 903-920 %V 51 %N 4 %I EDP-Sciences %U http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2016063/ %R 10.1051/ro/2016063 %G en %F RO_2017__51_4_903_0
zhao, Linlin; hu, Zhangchen; wang, Jun; zhuang, Yuliang. Estimating the impact of contextual variables on the productivity: An enhanced slack-based DEA model. RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 51 (2017) no. 4, pp. 903-920. doi : 10.1051/ro/2016063. http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2016063/
Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J. Econometrics 6 (1977) 21–37. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,Flexible measures in production process: a DEA-based approach. RAIRO: RO 45 (2011) 63–74. | DOI | Numdam | MR | Zbl
and ,Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. RAIRO: RO 34 (1986a) 513–521. | Zbl
and ,The use of categorical variables in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 32 (1986b) 1613–1627. | DOI
and ,Evaluating contextual variables affecting productivity using data envelopment analysis. Oper. Res. 56 (2008) 48–58. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,Determining teaching and research efficiencies. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 46 (1995) 441–452. | DOI | Zbl
,Measuring the efficiency of Decision-Making Units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978) 429–444. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,Foundation of data envelopment analysis and Pareto-koopmans empirical production functions. J. Econometrics 30 (1985) 91–107. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , , and ,A unified additive model approach for evaluating inefficiency and congestion with associated measures in DEA. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 34 (2000) 1–25. | DOI
, and ,Efficiency analysis accounting for internal and external non-discretionary factors. Comput. Oper. Res. 36 (2009) 1591–1601. | DOI | Zbl
, and ,Three-stage DEA models for incorporating exogenous inputs. Comput. Oper. Res. 37 (2010) 1087–1090. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,Incorporating the operating environment into a nonparametric measure of technical efficiency. J. Pro. Anal. 12 (1999) 249–267. | DOI
, and ,Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment analysis. J. Pro. Anal. 17 (2002) 157–174. | DOI
, and ,Efficiency and effectiveness of Spanish football teams: a three-stage-DEA approach. Central Eur. J. Oper. Res. 15 (2007) 21–45. | DOI | MR
,Testing the statistical significance of linear programming estimators. Manage. Sci. 52 (2006) 128–135. | DOI
and ,On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. J. Econometrics 19 (1982) 233–238. | DOI | MR
, , and ,A multivariate statistical approach to reducing the number of variables in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 147 (2003) 51–61. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,K.P. Kalirajan, On measuring the contribution of human capital to agricultural production. Indian Econ Rev. (1989) 247–261.
The worst-practice DEA model with slack-based measurement. Comput. Ind. Eng. 57 (2009) 496–505. | DOI
and ,Using least squares and tobit in second stage DEA analyses. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 197 (2009) 792–798. | DOI | Zbl
,A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors. Qual. Quant. 41 (2007) 673–690. | DOI
,J.T. Pastor, How to account for environmental effects in DEA: an application to bank branches. Working Paper University of Alicante, Spain (1995).
Resource-use efficiency in public schools: a study of Connecticut data. Manage. Sci. 37 (1991) 1620–8. | DOI | Zbl
,Non-discretionary inputs in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 111 (1998) 461–469. | DOI | Zbl
,Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. J. Econometrics 136 (2007) 31–64. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,Non-discretionary and discretionary factors and scale in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 158 (2004) 20–33. | DOI | Zbl
,A slack-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 130 (2001) 498–509. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 143 (2002) 32–41. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,Cité par Sources :