An analytical approach for behavioral portfolio model with time discounting preference
RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 52 (2018) no. 3, pp. 691-712.

This paper presents a behavioral portfolio selection model with time discounting preference. Firstly, we discuss the portfolio selection problem and then modify this model based on cumulative prospect theory (CPT) as well as considering investors’ time discounting preference in psychology. Furthermore, an analytical solution with satisfying behavior is given for our proposed model, the results show that when investors’ goals are very ambitious, they put a high proportion of their wealth in long-term goals and adopt aggressive investment strategies with high leverage to reach short-term goals and the overall investment strategy also displays high leverage. Finally, numerical analysis is given and it is shown that investor who tends to future bias performs adequate confidence and patience whereas investor with present bias is apt to the immediate interests.

DOI : 10.1051/ro/2017039
Classification : 91B28, 91G10, 97M30
Mots-clés : Time discounting, portfolio choice, satisfying behavior, analytical solution
Yang, Guang 1 ; Liu, Xinwang 1 ; Qin, Jindong 1 ; Khan, Ahmed 1

1
@article{RO_2018__52_3_691_0,
     author = {Yang, Guang and Liu, Xinwang and Qin, Jindong and Khan, Ahmed},
     title = {An analytical approach for behavioral portfolio model with time discounting preference},
     journal = {RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Op\'erationnelle},
     pages = {691--712},
     publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
     volume = {52},
     number = {3},
     year = {2018},
     doi = {10.1051/ro/2017039},
     mrnumber = {3868440},
     zbl = {1419.91597},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2017039/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Yang, Guang
AU  - Liu, Xinwang
AU  - Qin, Jindong
AU  - Khan, Ahmed
TI  - An analytical approach for behavioral portfolio model with time discounting preference
JO  - RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle
PY  - 2018
SP  - 691
EP  - 712
VL  - 52
IS  - 3
PB  - EDP-Sciences
UR  - http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2017039/
DO  - 10.1051/ro/2017039
LA  - en
ID  - RO_2018__52_3_691_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Yang, Guang
%A Liu, Xinwang
%A Qin, Jindong
%A Khan, Ahmed
%T An analytical approach for behavioral portfolio model with time discounting preference
%J RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle
%D 2018
%P 691-712
%V 52
%N 3
%I EDP-Sciences
%U http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2017039/
%R 10.1051/ro/2017039
%G en
%F RO_2018__52_3_691_0
Yang, Guang; Liu, Xinwang; Qin, Jindong; Khan, Ahmed. An analytical approach for behavioral portfolio model with time discounting preference. RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 52 (2018) no. 3, pp. 691-712. doi : 10.1051/ro/2017039. http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2017039/

[1] G. Ainslie and J.R. Monterosso, Building blocks of selfcontrol: Increased tolerance for delay with bundled rewards. J. Experimental Anal. Behavior 79 (2003) 37–48. | DOI

[2] A.E. Attema, H. Bleichrodt, Y. Gao, Zh. Huang and P.P. Wakker, Measuring Discounting without Measuring Utility. Amer. Econ. Rev. 106 (2016) 1476–1494. | DOI

[3] A.E. Attema, H. Bleichrodt, K.I.M. Rohde and P.P. Wakker, Time-Tradeoff Sequences for Analyzing Discounting and Time Inconsistency. Manag. Sci. 56 (2010) 2015–2030. | DOI

[4] N. Barberis and M. Huang, Stocks as lotteries: The implications of probability weighting for security prices. Amer. Econ. Rev. 98 (2008) 2066–2100. | DOI

[5] S. Benartzi and R.H. Thaler, Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quarterly J. Econ. 110 (1995) 73–92. | DOI | Zbl

[6] A.B. Berkelaar, R. Kouwenberg and T. Post, Optimal portfolio choice under loss aversion. Rev. Econ. Statis. 86 (2004) 973–987. | DOI

[7] F. Black, Beta and return. J. Portfolio Management 20 (1993) 8–18. | DOI

[8] M.C. Jensen Black, F. and M. Scholes, Portfolio selection: efficient diversification of investments. Praeger, New York (1972)

[9] D.B. Brown and M. Sim, Satisficing measures for analysis of risky positions. Manag. Sci. 55 (2009) 71–84. | DOI | Zbl

[10] G.B. Chapman, Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. J. Experimental Psychology-Learing Memory and Cognition 22 (1996) 771–791. | DOI

[11] G.B. Chapman, N.T. Brewer, E.J. Coups, S. Brownlee, H. Leventhal and E.A. Leventhal, Value for the future and preventive health behavior. J. Experimental Psychology-Appl. 7 (2001) 235–250. | DOI

[12] T.S. Critchfield and S.H. Kollins, Temporal discounting: Basic research and the analysis of socially important behavior. J. Appl. Behavior Anal. 34 (2001) 101–122. | DOI

[13] E.F. Fama and K.R. French, The cross-section of expected stock returns. J. Finance 47 (1992) 427–465.

[14] E.F. Fama and K.R. French, The CAPM is wanted, dead or alive. J. Finance 51 (1996) 1947–1958. | DOI

[15] F.J. Gomes, Portfolio choice and trading volume with loss-averse investors. J. Business 78 (2005) 675–706. | DOI

[16] L. Green and J. Myerson, Exponential versus hyperbolic discounting of delayed outcomes: Risk and waiting time. Amer. Zoologist 36 (1996) 496–505. | DOI

[17] W. Gueth, M.V. Levati and M. Ploner, On the social dimension of time and risk preferences: An experimental study. Economic Inquiry 46 (2008) 261–272. | DOI

[18] M. Hamada, M. Sherris and J. Van Der Hoek Dynamic portfolio allocation, the dual theory of choice and probability distortion functions. Astin Bulletin 36 (2006) 187–217. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[19] D.A. Hantula and K. Bryant, Delay discounting determines delivery fees in an e-commerce simulation: A behavioral economic perspective. Psychology and Maketing 22 (2005) 153–161. | DOI

[20] G.W. Harrison and M.L. Lau, Is the evidence for hyperbolic discounting in humans just an experimental artefact? Behavioral and Brain Sci. 28 (2005) 657.

[21] X. Dong He and X. Yu Zhou Portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory: An analytical treatment. Manag. Sci. 57 (2011) 315–331. | Zbl

[22] H. Jin and X. Yu Zhou Continuous-time behavioral portfolio selection. In 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, CDC, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (2008) 5602–5607.

[23] H. Jin and X. Yu Zhou Greed, leverage and potential losses: A prospect theory perspective. Math. Finance 23 (2013) 122–142. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[24] I. Karatzas and , Karatzas, I. and St. E. Shreve: Brownian motion and stochastic calculus. Statist.Papers 30 (1989) 262. | Zbl

[25] H. Levy and M. Levy, Prospect theory and mean-variance analysis. Rev. Financial Studies 17 (2004) 1015–1041. | DOI

[26] H.M. Markowitz, The Utility of Wealth. J. Political Economy 60 (1952) 151–158. | DOI

[27] R.C. Merton, An analytic derivation of the efficient portfolio frontier. J. Financial and Quantitative Anal. 7 (1972) 1851–1872. | DOI

[28] J. Myerson and L. Green, Discounting of delayed rewards – Models of individual choice. J. Experimental Anal. Behavior 64 (1995) 263–276. | DOI

[29] F. Paglieri, D. Parisi, M. Patacchiola and G. Petrosino, Investigating intertemporal choice through experimental evolutionary robotics. Behavioural Processes 115 (2015) 1–18. | DOI

[30] D. Prelec, Decreasing impatience: A criterion for non-stationary time preference and “Hyperbolic” discounting. Scandinavian J. Econ. 106 (2004) 511–532. | DOI

[31] M. Rasonyi and A.M. Rodrigues, Continuous-time portfolio optimisation for a behavioural investor with bounded utility on gains. Electr. Commun. Probab. 19 (2014) 1–13. | MR | Zbl

[32] B. Saunders and G. Fogarty, Time discounting in relation to career preferences. J. Vocational Behavior 58 (2001) 118–126. | DOI

[33] S. Sayman and A. Onculer, An investigation of time inconsistency. Mang. Sci. 55 (2009) 470–482. | DOI | Zbl

[34] W.F. Sharpe, A simplified model for portfolio analysis. Manag. Sci. 9 (1963) 277–293. | DOI

[35] W.F. Sharpe, Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J. Finance 19 (1964) 425–442.

[36] T. Shavit and M. Rosenboim, Is there time discounting for risk premium? J. Experimental Anal. Behavior 103 (2015) 393–404. | DOI

[37] H. Shefrin and M. Statman, Behavioral portfolio theory. J. Financial and Quantitative Anal. 35 (2000) 127–151. | DOI

[38] C.L. Smith and D.A. Hantula, Pricing effects on foraging in a simulated Internet shopping mall. J. Econ. Psychology 24 (2003) 653–674. | DOI

[39] K. Takeuchi, Non-parametric test of time consistency: Present bias and future bias. Games and Economic Behavior 71 (2011) 456–478. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[40] J. Tobin, Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk. Rev. Econ. Studies 67 (1958) 65–86. | DOI

[41] A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5 (1992) 297–323. | DOI | Zbl

[42] Th. Van Huizen and J. Plantenga, Job search behaviour and time preferences: Testing exponential versus hyperbolic discounting. Econ.-Netherlands 162 (2014) 223–245.

[43] A. Waegeman, C.H. Declerck, Ch. Boone, W. Van Hecke and P.M. Parizel, Individual differences in self-control in a time discounting task: An fMRI study. J. Neuroscience Psychol. Econ. 7 (2014) 65–79. | DOI

[44] M.E. Yaari, The dual theory of choice under risk. Econ. 55 (1987) 99–115. | MR | Zbl

Cité par Sources :