In the transport field, two characteristics–inter-temporal dependency and fuzziness–need to be considered when assessing transport performance. First, input and output levels are inter-temporal dependent due to heavy capital investment and because quasi-fixed input can influence output levels over multiple periods. Second, conventional Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models are, in nature, formulated with quantitative variables. However, qualitative measurements that are characterized with “vagueness” or “fuzziness” are as important as quantitative variables for multi-period transport performance assessment. To rectify these problems, the present study extends previous research by proposing a Dynamic Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis (DFDEA) method for assessing the comparative efficiency where inter-temporal dependence exists in operating production processes with some “fuzzy” variables. An case study was conducted to evaluate the performance of city bus transport companies in Taipei, Taiwan. Results showed the superiority of the proposed DFDEA model by comparing the results with static models.
Accepté le :
DOI : 10.1051/ro/2017064
Mots-clés : Fuzzy data envelopment analysis, dynamic data envelopment analysis, bus transport, dynamic efficiency, membership function
@article{RO_2019__53_3_991_0, author = {Yen, Barbara T.H. and Chiou, Yu-Chiun}, title = {Dynamic fuzzy data envelopment analysis models: case of bus transport performance assessment}, journal = {RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Op\'erationnelle}, pages = {991--1005}, publisher = {EDP-Sciences}, volume = {53}, number = {3}, year = {2019}, doi = {10.1051/ro/2017064}, zbl = {1423.90146}, language = {en}, url = {http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2017064/} }
TY - JOUR AU - Yen, Barbara T.H. AU - Chiou, Yu-Chiun TI - Dynamic fuzzy data envelopment analysis models: case of bus transport performance assessment JO - RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle PY - 2019 SP - 991 EP - 1005 VL - 53 IS - 3 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2017064/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2017064 LA - en ID - RO_2019__53_3_991_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Yen, Barbara T.H. %A Chiou, Yu-Chiun %T Dynamic fuzzy data envelopment analysis models: case of bus transport performance assessment %J RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle %D 2019 %P 991-1005 %V 53 %N 3 %I EDP-Sciences %U http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2017064/ %R 10.1051/ro/2017064 %G en %F RO_2019__53_3_991_0
Yen, Barbara T.H.; Chiou, Yu-Chiun. Dynamic fuzzy data envelopment analysis models: case of bus transport performance assessment. RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 53 (2019) no. 3, pp. 991-1005. doi : 10.1051/ro/2017064. http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2017064/
Evaluating efficiency in the Norwegian bus industry using data envelopment analysis. Transp. 28 (2001) 211–232.
and ,An integrated benchmarking approach to distribution center performance using DEA modeling. J. Oper. Manag. 20 (2002) 19–32.
and ,Benchmarking marketing productivity using data envelopment analysis. J. Business Res. 58 (2005) 1474–1482.
, and ,Models for performance benchmarking: Measuring the effect of e-business activities on banking performance. Omega 3 (2004) 313–322.
, and ,Operational performance of airlines: An extension of traditional measurement paradigms. Strategic Manag. J. 14 (1993) 301–317.
,Robustly efficient parametric frontiers via multiplicative DEA for domestic and international operations of the Latin American airline industry. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 88 (1996) 525–536. | Zbl
and , .A dynamic efficiency model using data envelopment analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 62 (1999) 209–218.
,Evaluation of deregulated airline networks using data envelopment analysis combined with principal component analysis with an application to Western. Europe. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 132 (2001) 260–273. | Zbl
and ,Route–based performance evaluation of Taiwanese domestic airlines using data envelopment analysis. Transp. Res. Part E 42 (2006) 116–127.
and ,Assessing the on-road route efficiency for an air–express courier. J. Adv. Transp. 44 (2010) 256–266.
, and ,Competitive advantage of low–cost carriers: Some implications for airports. J. Air Transp. Manag. 10 (1997) 41–50.
and ,Developing measures of airport productivity and performance: an application of data envelopment analysis. Transp. Res. E 33 (1997) 261–273.
and ,Assessing the relative efficiency of aircraft maintenance technologies: An application of data envelopment analysis. Transp. Res. Part A 32 (1998) 261–269.
, and ,A DEA approach to the airport production function. Int. J. Transp. Econ. 26 (1999) 255–270.
,An analysis of the operational efficiency of major airports in the United States. J. Oper. Manag. 18 (2000) 335–351.
,An application of DEA to measure the efficiency of Spanish airports prior to privatization. J. Air Transp. Manag. 7 (2001) 149–157.
and ,Measuring airport quality from the airlines’ viewpoint: An application of data envelopment analysis. Transp. Policy 8 (2001) 171–181.
and ,Performance evaluation of Italian airports: A data envelopment analysis, J. Air Transp. Manag. 13 (2007) 184–191.
and ,Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis. Transp. Res. Part A 35 (2001) 113–128.
,The technical efficiency of container ports: Comparing data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. Transp. Res. Part A 40 (2006) 354–374.
, , and ,Managing Public Transit Strategically. Jossey–Bass Inc, San Francisco (1987).
,Performance evaluation for bus transit. Transp. Res. Part A 19 (1985) 73–82.
, and ,Determinants of productive efficiency in urban transit. Logistic Transp. Rev. 32 (1996) 319–342.
,Technical efficiency measurement and explanation of French urban transit companies. Transp. Res. Part A 30 (1996) 431–452.
,Changes in multi–mode bus transit efficiency. Transp. 25 (1998) 1–21.
,Evaluating efficiency in the Norwegian bus industry using data envelopment analysis. Transp. 28 (2001) 211–232.
and ,Identifying and measuring public policy goals: ISTEA and the US bus transit industry. J. Econ. Behavior Organiz. 48 (2002) 291–304.
, and ,A DEA approach for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of urban transit systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 152 (2004) 354–364. | Zbl
,Performance evaluation of bus routes: A provider and passenger perspective. Transp. Res. Part E 43 (2007) 453–478.
, and ,Comparing the efficiency of public transportation subunits using data envelopment analysis. J. Public Transp. 10 (2007) 1–16.
, and ,Accounting for accidents in the measurement of transport inefficiency: A case of Taiwanese bus transit, Int. J. Environ. Sustain. Develop. 8 (2009) 365–385.
and ,A joint measurement of efficiency and effectiveness for non–storable commodities: Integrated data envelopment analysis approaches. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 201 (2010) 477–489. | Zbl
, and ,Route–based data envelopment analysis models. Transp. Res. Part E 48 (2012) 415–425.
, and ,Integrated fuzzy data envelopment analysis models: Case of bus transport performance assessment. Transp. A 10 (2014) 401–419.
, and ,Economic efficiency of railways and implications for public policy. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 28 (1994) 121–138.
and ,A comparison of parametric and non–parametric distance functions: With application to European railways. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 117 (1999) 326–339. | Zbl
and ,Measuring railway performance with adjustment of environmental effects, data noise and slacks. Transportmetrica 1 (2005) 161–189.
and ,Technical efficiency and service effectiveness for railways industry: DEA approaches. J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 5 (2003) 2932–2947.
and ,Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 140 (2002) 24–36. | Zbl
and ,A fuzzy mathematical programming approach to the assessment of efficiency with DEA models. Fuzzy Sets Sys. 139 (2003) 407–419. | Zbl
, , and ,Using data envelopment analysis for evaluating flexible manufacturing systems in the presence of imprecise data. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 35 (2008) 867–874.
,Performance measurement with fuzzy data envelopment analysis. Berlin and, Springer, Heidelberg (2014).
and ,A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: two decades in the making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 214 (2011) 457–472. | Zbl
, and ,Fuzzy efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 113 (2000) 427–437. | Zbl
and ,Fuzzy weighted average: The linear programming approach via Charne and Cooper’s rule. Fuzzy Sets Sys. 117 (2001) 157–160. | Zbl
, and ,A flexible deterministic, stochastic and fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach for supply chain risk and vendor selection problem: Simulation analysis. Expert Systems Appl. 37 (2010) 7438–7448.
and ,Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data: an application of Taiwan machinery firms. Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge–Based Systems 13 (2005) 225–240.
and ,Data envelopment analysis with missing values: An interval DEA approach, Appl. Math. Comput. 177 (2006) 1–10. | Zbl
, and ,A fuzzy mathematical programming approach to DEA models. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 5 (2008) 1352–1357.
, , and ,Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA): a possibility approach. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 139 (2003) 379–394. | Zbl
, , and ,Dynamic data envelopment analysis: modeling intertemporal behaviour of a firm in the presence of productive inefficiencies. Econ. Lett. 64 (1999) 51–56. | Zbl
and ,Measure of productivity index with dynamic DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 8 (2010) 247–260. | Zbl
and ,A mathematical model for dynamic efficiency using data envelopment analysis. Appl. Math. Comput. 160 (2005) 363–378. | Zbl
and ,Dynamic DEA: A slacks–based measure approach. Omega 38 (2010) 145–156.
and ,Productivity and quality changes in Swedish pharmacies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 39 (1995) 137–144.
, and ,Productivity changes in Swedish pharamacies 1980–1989: A non–parametric Malmquist approach. International Applications of Productivity and Efficiency Analysis. Springer Netherlands (1992) 81–97.
, , and ,Race to the bottom or swimming upstream: Performance analysis of US airlines. J. Air Transp. Manag. 15 (2009) 227–235.
,Is it the labor unions’ fault? Dissecting the causes of the impaired technical efficiencies of the legacy carriers in the United States. Transp. Res. Part A 43 (2009) 779–789.
,Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978) 429–444. | MR | Zbl
, and ,Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag. Sci. 30 (1984) 1078–1092. | Zbl
, and ,Cité par Sources :