Production-inventory and emission reduction investment decision under carbon cap-and-trade policy
RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 52 (2018) no. 4-5, pp. 1043-1067.

The increasing amount of carbon emissions has caused global warming and challenged the sustainable development of environment. Governments around the world have implemented carbon policies including carbon cap-and-trade policy. In this paper, we focus on how a two-echelon supply chain manages its carbon footprints in production and inventory under carbon cap-and-trade policy. We extend the classical EOQ (economic order quantity) model and study decisions on production-inventory, carbon trading and emission reduction investment in the decentralized and centralized situations. The results show that emission permit sharing can effectively reduce the total cost and total carbon emissions of the supply chain. Moreover, the manufacturer’s emission reduction effort rises with the increase of the buying and selling prices of emission permits under centralized decision-making. In addition, a compensation mechanism is proposed for the centralized supply chain with emission permit sharing. It is observed that the buying and selling prices of emission permits have a positive influence on the permit sharing price in the compensation mechanism. Meanwhile, the retailer pays less for using the emission permits if it has a higher carbon cap, while the manufacturer with a higher carbon cap is more capable to provide a high compensation for the retailer.

DOI : 10.1051/ro/2018033
Classification : 91A40
Mots-clés : Production-inventory, emission permit sharing, emission reduction investment, cap-and-trade policy, supply chain
Fan, Yuyao 1 ; Wang, Min 1 ; Zhao, Lindu 1

1 
@article{RO_2018__52_4-5_1043_0,
     author = {Fan, Yuyao and Wang, Min and Zhao, Lindu},
     title = {Production-inventory and emission reduction investment decision under carbon cap-and-trade policy},
     journal = {RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Op\'erationnelle},
     pages = {1043--1067},
     publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
     volume = {52},
     number = {4-5},
     year = {2018},
     doi = {10.1051/ro/2018033},
     mrnumber = {3878618},
     zbl = {1411.91440},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2018033/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fan, Yuyao
AU  - Wang, Min
AU  - Zhao, Lindu
TI  - Production-inventory and emission reduction investment decision under carbon cap-and-trade policy
JO  - RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle
PY  - 2018
SP  - 1043
EP  - 1067
VL  - 52
IS  - 4-5
PB  - EDP-Sciences
UR  - http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2018033/
DO  - 10.1051/ro/2018033
LA  - en
ID  - RO_2018__52_4-5_1043_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Fan, Yuyao
%A Wang, Min
%A Zhao, Lindu
%T Production-inventory and emission reduction investment decision under carbon cap-and-trade policy
%J RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle
%D 2018
%P 1043-1067
%V 52
%N 4-5
%I EDP-Sciences
%U http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2018033/
%R 10.1051/ro/2018033
%G en
%F RO_2018__52_4-5_1043_0
Fan, Yuyao; Wang, Min; Zhao, Lindu. Production-inventory and emission reduction investment decision under carbon cap-and-trade policy. RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 52 (2018) no. 4-5, pp. 1043-1067. doi : 10.1051/ro/2018033. http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2018033/

[1] N. Absi, S. Dauzère-Pérès, S. Kedad-Sidhoum, B. Penz and C. Rapine, Lot sizing with carbon emission constraints. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 227 (2013) 55–61. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[2] D. Battini, A. Persona and F. Sgarbossa, A sustainable EOQ model: theoretical formulation and applications. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 149 (2014) 145–153. | DOI

[3] S. Benjaafar, Y. Li and M. Daskin, Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: insights from simple models. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 10 (2013) 99–116. | DOI

[4] S. Bode, Multi-period emissions trading in the electricity sectorwinners and losers. Energy Policy, 34 (2006) 680–691. | DOI

[5] C. Boemare and P. Quirion, Implementing greenhouse gas trading in Europe: lessons from economic literature and international experiences. Ecol. Econ. 43 (2002) 213–230. | DOI

[6] Y. Bouchery, A. Ghaffari, Z. Jemai and Y. Dallery, Including sustainability criteria into inventory models. Euro. J. Oper. Res. 222 (2012) 229–240. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[7] X. Chen, S. Benjaafar and A. Elomri, The carbon-constrained EOQ. Oper. Res. Lett. 41 (2013) 172–179. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[8] D. Demailly and P. Quirion, European emission trading scheme and competitiveness: a case study on the iron and steel industry. Energy Econ. 30 (2008) 2009–2027. | DOI

[9] I. Dobos, The effects of emission trading on production and inventories in the Arrow–Karlin model. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 93 (2005) 301–308. | DOI

[10] C. Dong, B. Shen, P.S. Chow, L. Yang and C.T. Ng, Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation. Ann. Oper. Res. 240 (2016) 509–531. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[11] S. Du, L. Zhu, L. Liang and F. Ma, Emission-dependent supply chain and environment-policy-making in the cap-and-tradesystem. Energy Policy 57 (2013) 61–67. | DOI

[12] S. Du, J. Zhu, H. Jiao and W. Ye, Game-theoretical analysis for supply chain with consumer preference to low carbon. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53 (2015) 3753–3768. | DOI

[13] A. Eydi and M. Bakhtiari, A multi-product model for evaluating and selecting two layers of suppliers considering environmental factors. RAIRO: OR 51 (2017) 875–902. | DOI | Numdam | MR | Zbl

[14] H. Gurnani and M. Erkoc, Supply contracts in manufacturer-retailer interactions with manufacturer-quality and retailer effort-induced demand. NRL 55 (2008) 200–217. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[15] R. Hammami, I. Nouira and Y. Frein, Carbon emissions in a multi-echelon production-inventory model with lead time constraints. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 164 (2015) 292–307. | DOI

[16] K.M.R. Hoen, T. Tan, J.C. Fransoo and G.J. Van Houtum, Effect of carbon emission regulations on transport mode selection in supplychains. Eindhoven University of Technology (2010).

[17] V. Hovelaque and L. Bironneau, The carbon-constrained EOQ model with carbon emission dependent demand. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 164 (2015) 285–291. | DOI

[18] G. Hua, T.C.E. Cheng and S. Wang, Managing carbon footprints in inventory management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 132 (2011) 178–185. | DOI

[19] M.Y. Jaber, C.H. Glock and A.M. El Saadany Supply chain coordination with emissions reduction incentives. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 51 (2013) 69–82. | DOI

[20] A. Kanda and S.G. Deshmukh, Supply chain coordination: perspectives, empirical studies and research directions. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 115 (2008) 316–335. | DOI

[21] D. Konur, Carbon constrained integrated inventory control and truckload transportation with heterogeneous freight trucks. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 153 (2014) 268–279. | DOI

[22] Y. Li, L. Xu and D. Li, Examining relationships between the return policy, product quality, and pricing strategy in online direct selling. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 144 (2013) 451–460. | DOI

[23] Z.L. Liu, T.D. Anderson and J.M. Cruz, Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains. Euro. J. Oper. Res. 218 (2012) 602–613. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[24] L. Lu, J. Zhang and W. Tang, Coordinating a supply chain with negative effect of retailers local promotion on goodwill and reference price. RAIRO: OR 51 (2017) 227–252. | DOI | Numdam | MR | Zbl

[25] S. Majidi, S.M. Hosseini-Motlagh, S. Yaghoubi and A. Jokar, Fuzzy green vehicle routing problem with simultaneous pickupcdelivery and time windows. RAIRO: OR 51 (2017) 1151–1176. | DOI | Numdam | MR | Zbl

[26] I. Nouira, Y. Frein and A.B. Hadj-Alouane, Optimization of manufacturing systems under environmental considerations for a greenness-dependent demand. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 150 (2014) 188–198. | DOI

[27] A. Rose and B. Stevens, The efficiency and equity of marketable permits for CO2 emissions. Resour. Energy Econ. 15 (1993) 117–146. | DOI

[28] R. Smale, M. Hartley, C. Hepburn, J. Ward and M. Grubb, The impact of CO2 emissions trading on firm profits and market prices. Clim. Policy 6 (2006) 31–48. | DOI

[29] S. Swami and J. Shah. Channel coordination in green supply chain management. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 64 (2013) 336–351. | DOI

[30] A. Toptal and B. Çetinkaya, How supply chain coordination affects the environment: a carbon footprint perspective. Ann. Oper. Res. 250 (2017) 487–519. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[31] A. Toptal, H. Özlü and D. Konur, Joint decisions on inventory replenishment and emission reduction investment under different emission regulations. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52 (2014) 243–269. | DOI

[32] X. Xu, P. He, H. Xu and Q. Zhang, Supply chain coordination with green technology under cap-and-trade regulation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 183 (2017) 433–442. | DOI

[33] L. Yang, C. Zheng and M. Xu, Comparisons of low carbon policies in supply chain coordination. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 23 (2014) 342–361 | DOI

[34] S. Zanoni, L. Mazzoldi, L.E. Zavanella and M.Y. Jaber, A joint economic lot size model with price and environmentally sensitive demand. Prod. Manuf. Res. 2 (2014) 341–354.

[35] W. Zeng,C. Wang and H. Zhou, Study on supply chain operations under carbon emission regulatory policies, in Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering (ICIII), 2012 International Conference on, IEEE. Vol. 2 (2012) 506–509.

[36] L. Zhang,J. Wang and J. You, Consumer environmental awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products. Euro. J. Oper. Res. 241 (2015) 63–73. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[37] P. Zhang,Y. He and C.V. Shi, Transshipment and coordination in a two-echelon supply chain. RAIRO: OR 51 (2017) 729–747. | DOI | Numdam | MR | Zbl

Cité par Sources :