This paper discusses the impact of ganging decision making units (DMUs) on the cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis (DEA). A group of DMUs are said to be ganging-together if the minimum and the maximum cross-efficiency scores they give to all other DMUs are identical. This study demonstrates that the ganging phenomenon can significantly influence the cross-efficiency evaluation in favour of some DMUs. To overcome this shortcoming, we propose a gangless cross-efficiency evaluation approach. The suggested method reduces the effect of ganging and generates a more diversified list of top performing units. An application to the Tehran stock market is used to show the benefits of gangless cross-evaluation.
Accepté le :
DOI : 10.1051/ro/2018060
Mots-clés : Data envelopment analysis, cross-efficiency evaluation, ganging decision making units, gangless cross-evaluation, stock selection
@article{RO_2019__53_2_645_0, author = {Amin, Gholam R. and Oukil, Amar}, title = {Gangless cross-evaluation in {DEA:} an application to stock selection}, journal = {RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Op\'erationnelle}, pages = {645--655}, publisher = {EDP-Sciences}, volume = {53}, number = {2}, year = {2019}, doi = {10.1051/ro/2018060}, mrnumber = {3961737}, zbl = {1423.90075}, language = {en}, url = {http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2018060/} }
TY - JOUR AU - Amin, Gholam R. AU - Oukil, Amar TI - Gangless cross-evaluation in DEA: an application to stock selection JO - RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle PY - 2019 SP - 645 EP - 655 VL - 53 IS - 2 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2018060/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2018060 LA - en ID - RO_2019__53_2_645_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Amin, Gholam R. %A Oukil, Amar %T Gangless cross-evaluation in DEA: an application to stock selection %J RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle %D 2019 %P 645-655 %V 53 %N 2 %I EDP-Sciences %U http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2018060/ %R 10.1051/ro/2018060 %G en %F RO_2019__53_2_645_0
Amin, Gholam R.; Oukil, Amar. Gangless cross-evaluation in DEA: an application to stock selection. RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 53 (2019) no. 2, pp. 645-655. doi : 10.1051/ro/2018060. http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2018060/
[1] Ranking ranges in cross-efficiency evaluations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 226 (2013) 516–521. | MR | Zbl
, , and ,[2] Some clarifications on the DEA clustering approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 215 (2011) 498–501. | MR
, and ,[3] DEA based models for reallocations of police personnel. OR Spect. 34 (2012) 921–941. | MR | Zbl
, and ,[4] Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978) 429–444. | MR | Zbl
, and ,[5] A stochastic cross-efficiency data envelopment analysis approach for supplier selection under uncertainty. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 23 (2016) 725–748. | MR | Zbl
, , and ,[6] Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 45 (1994) 567–578. | Zbl
and ,[7] Fixed cost and resource allocation based on DEA cross-efficiency. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 235 (2014) 206–214. | MR | Zbl
, , and ,[8] Advances in data envelopment analysis. Ann. Oper. Res. 214 (2014) 1–4. | MR | Zbl
,[9] Improving discernment in DEA using profiling: a comment. Omega 24 (1996) 365–366.
and ,[10] A new ranking approach with a modified cross efficiency matrix. Asia-Pac. J. Oper. Res. 30 (2013) 1–17. | MR | Zbl
and ,[11] Use of DEA cross-efficiency evaluation in portfolio selection: an application to Korean stock market. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 236 (2014) 361–368. | MR | Zbl
, and ,[12] Research fronts in data envelopment analysis. Omega 58 (2016) 33–45.
, and ,[13] Technical, environmental and eco-efficiency measurement for supplier selection: an extension and application of data envelopment analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 168 (2015) 279–289.
, and ,[14] An integrated multi-objective Markowitz-DEA cross-efficiency method with fuzzy returns for portfolio selection problem. Appl. Soft Comput. 38 (2016) 1–9.
and ,[15] Cross-efficiency in DEA: a maximum resonated appreciative model. Measurement 63 (2015) 159–167.
, and ,[16] A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects. Manage. Sci. 37 (1991) 871–885. | Zbl
, and ,[17] The appreciative democratic voice of DEA: a case of faculty academic performance evaluation. Socio-Econ. Planning Sci. 48 (2014) 20–28.
, , and ,[18] Ranking via composite weighting schemes under a DEA cross-evaluation framework. Comput. Ind. Eng. 117 (2018) 217–224.
,[19] Maximum appreciative cross-efficiency in DEA: a new ranking method. Comput. Ind. Eng. 81 (2015) 14–21.
and ,[20] A systematic approach for ranking football players within an integrated DEA-OWA framework. Manage. Decis. Econ. 38 (2017) 1125–1136.
and ,[21] A new clustering approach using data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 199 (2009) 276–284. | Zbl
, and ,[22] Dominance relations and ranking of units by using interval number ordering with cross-efficiency intervals. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 65 (2014) 1336–1343.
, and ,[23] Combined soft computing model for value stock selection based on fundamental analysis. Appl. Soft Comput. 37 (2015) 142–155.
and ,[24] Selecting a benevolent secondary goal model in data envelopment analysis cross-evaluation by a voting model. Socio-Econ. Planning Sci. 47 (2013) 65–74.
and ,[25] Improving discernment in DEA using profiling. Omega 24 (1996) 361–364.
,[26] Cross-weight evaluation for pairwise comparison matrices. Group Decis. Negotiat. 22 (2013) 483–497.
, and ,[27] Evaluation method based on ranking in data envelopment analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 40 (2013) 257–262.
and ,Cité par Sources :