Building energy consumption accounts for a considerable proportion on energy consumption. To reduce building energy consumption, building energy efficiency retrofitting (BEER) based on Energy Performance Contracting mechanism is the most feasible and cost-effective method. With the increase number of BEER projects, BEER project selection has become an essential problem for energy service companies. In this paper, a multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) method is proposed to deal with BEER project selection problem. First, picture fuzzy sets are employed to describe the evaluation information under the complex and uncertain environment. Subsequently, picture fuzzy weighted average operator and Laplace distribution-picture fuzzy order weighted average operator are proposed based on convex combination to aggregate individual evaluations into the overall evaluations. Furthermore, picture fuzzy TOPSIS-based QUALIFLEX method is developed to identify the optimal ranking of alternatives. Moreover, the practicality, effectiveness and advantages of the proposed MCGDM method are illustrated using a case study of hotel BEER project selection and comparative analysis. Finally, conclusions about primary contributions, and future discussions of the proposed method are demonstrated.
Accepté le :
Première publication :
Publié le :
DOI : 10.1051/ro/2019004
Mots-clés : Multi-criteria group decision-making, Picture fuzzy sets, TOPISIS-QUALIFLEX, Laplace distribution-picture fuzzy order weighted average, Hotel building energy efficiency retrofit
@article{RO_2020__54_1_211_0, author = {Wang, Le and Zhang, Hong-Yu and Wang, Jian-Qiang and Wu, Guo-Fang}, title = {Picture fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making method to hotel building energy efficiency retrofit project selection}, journal = {RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Op\'erationnelle}, pages = {211--229}, publisher = {EDP-Sciences}, volume = {54}, number = {1}, year = {2020}, doi = {10.1051/ro/2019004}, mrnumber = {4061512}, zbl = {1439.62053}, language = {en}, url = {http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2019004/} }
TY - JOUR AU - Wang, Le AU - Zhang, Hong-Yu AU - Wang, Jian-Qiang AU - Wu, Guo-Fang TI - Picture fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making method to hotel building energy efficiency retrofit project selection JO - RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle PY - 2020 SP - 211 EP - 229 VL - 54 IS - 1 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2019004/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2019004 LA - en ID - RO_2020__54_1_211_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Wang, Le %A Zhang, Hong-Yu %A Wang, Jian-Qiang %A Wu, Guo-Fang %T Picture fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making method to hotel building energy efficiency retrofit project selection %J RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle %D 2020 %P 211-229 %V 54 %N 1 %I EDP-Sciences %U http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2019004/ %R 10.1051/ro/2019004 %G en %F RO_2020__54_1_211_0
Wang, Le; Zhang, Hong-Yu; Wang, Jian-Qiang; Wu, Guo-Fang. Picture fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making method to hotel building energy efficiency retrofit project selection. RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 54 (2020) no. 1, pp. 211-229. doi : 10.1051/ro/2019004. http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2019004/
[1] Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 21 (1986) 87–96. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[2] A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. Int. J. Product. Econ. 102 (2006) 289–301. | DOI
, and ,[3] Fuzzy linear programming based on statistical conidence interval and interval-valued fuzzy set. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 129 (2001) 65–86. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[4] Long term experimental evaluation of the influence of heat cost allocators on energy consumption in a multifamily building. Energy Build. 104 (2015) 122–130. | DOI
and ,[5] Energy retrofits of Danish homes: is the Energy Performance Certificate useful?. Build. Res. Inf. 42 (2014) 489–500. | DOI
, , and ,[6] Picture fuzzy sets. J. Comput. Sci. Cybern. 30 (2014) 409–420.
and ,[7] Exponential distance-based fuzzy clustering for interval-valued data. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Making 16 (2017) 51–70. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , and ,[8] On aggregation operations of linguistic labels, Int. J. Intell. Syst. 8 (2010) 351–370. | DOI | Zbl
, and ,[9] Ordered weighted averaging operators 1988–2014: a citation-based literature survey. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 29 (2015) 994–1014. | DOI
and ,[10] Cognitive and motivational biases in decision and risk analysis. Risk Anal. Official Publ. Soc. Risk Anal. 35 (2015) 1230–1251. | DOI
and ,[11] An extension of fuzzy TOPSIS for a group decision making with an application to Tehran stock exchange. Appl. Soft Comput. 52 (2017) 1084–1097. | DOI
and ,[12] Comparative study of commercial building energy-efficiency retrofit policies in four pilot cities in China. Energy Policy 88 (2016) 204–215. | DOI
, , , and ,[13] An optimization framework for building energy retrofits decision-making. Build. Environ. 115 (2017) 118–129. | DOI
and ,[14] A fuzzy decision support model with sentiment analysis for items comparison in e-commerce: the case study of PConline.com. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 49 (2019) 1993–2004. | DOI
, and ,[15] Evaluation of large scale building energy efficiency retrofit program in Kuwait. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 50 (2015) 1069–1080. | DOI
,[16] Generalized picture distance measure and applications to picture fuzzy clustering. Appl. Soft Comput. 46 (2016) 284–295. | DOI
,[17] Measuring analogousness in picture fuzzy sets: from picture distance measures to picture association measures. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Making 16 (2017) 359–378. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[18] An extended QUALIFLEX method under probability hesitant fuzzy environment for selecting green suppliers. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19 (2017) 1866–1879. | DOI | MR
and ,[19] Interval neutrosophic prioritized OWA operator and its application to multiple attribute decision making. J. Syst. Sci. Complexity 29 (2016) 681–697. | DOI | Zbl
and ,[20] Hesitant pythagorean fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 33 (2017) 1105–1117. | DOI | Zbl
, , , and ,[21] The Laplace Distribution and generalizations: a revisit with applications to communications, economics, engineering, and finance. J. R. Stat. Soc. 97 (2001) 1210–1211.
,[22] Breast tumor classification using a new OWA operator. Expert Syst. App. 61 (2016) 302–313. | DOI
, and ,[23] Biases and debiasing in multi-criteria decision analysis. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2015), 1218–1226.
and ,[24] A hybrid outranking method for greenhouse gas emissions institution selection with picture 2-tuple linguistic information. Comput. Appl. Math. 37 (2018) 6676–6699. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[25] Outranking decision-making method with Z-number cognitive information. Cognitive Comput. 10 (2018) 752–768. | DOI
and ,[26] Multi-criteria game model based on the pairwise comparisons of strategies with Z-numbers. Appl. Soft Comput. 74 (2019) 451–465. | DOI
, , and ,[27] Probability multi-valued neutrosophic sets and its application in multi-criteria group decision-making problems. Neural Comput. App. 30 (2018) 563–583. | DOI
, and ,[28] How well does the OWA operator represent real preferences? Eur. J. Oper. Res. 258 (2017) 993–1003. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[29] A hybrid segmentation approach based on Neutrosophic sets and modified watershed: a case of abdominal CT Liver parenchyma. In: Computer Engineering Conference (2016) 144–149.
, , , and ,[30] Distance and distance induced intuitionistic entropy of generalized intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets. Appl. Intell. 47 (2017) 132–147. | DOI
, , and ,[31] An approach for making optimal decisions in building energy efficiency retrofit projects. Indoor Built Environ. 27 (2018) 348–368. | DOI
, and ,[32] A likelihood-based qualitative flexible approach with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. Cognitive Comput. 8 (2016) 670–683. | DOI
, , and ,[33] Simplified neutrosophic linguistic multi-criteria group decision-making approach to green product development. Group Decis. Negotiation 26 (2017) 597–627. | DOI
, , and ,[34] Some geometric aggregation operators based on picture sets and their application in multiple attribute decision making. Ital. J. Pure Appl. Math. 37 (2017) 477–492. | MR | Zbl
, , and ,[35] A multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic multi-criteria decision-making approach for logistics outsourcing with incomplete weight information. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 25 (2018) 831–856. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , and ,[36] A likelihood-based QUALIFLEX method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets for multiple criteria decision analysis. Soft Comput. 19 (2015) 2225–2243. | DOI
, and ,[37] A multi-criteria decision-making framework for risk ranking of energy performance contracting project under picture fuzzy environment. J. Cleaner Product. 191 (2018) 105–118. | DOI
, and ,[38] Picture fuzzy normalized projection-based VIKOR method for the risk evaluation of construction project. Appl. Soft Comput. 64 (2018) 216–226. | DOI
, , and ,[39] Distance-based multi-criteria group decision-making approach with probabilistic linguistic term sets. Expert Syst. 36 (2019) e12352. | DOI
, and ,[40] Fuzzy stochastic multi-criteria decision-making methods with interval neutrosophic probability based on regret theory. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 35 (2018) 2309–2322. | DOI
, and ,[41] Operators and comparisons of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22 (2014) 575–585. | DOI
, and ,[42] Interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 7 (2016) 1093–1114. | DOI
,[43] Picture fuzzy cross-entropy for multiple attribute decision making problems. J. Bus. Econ. Manage. 17 (2016) 491–502. | DOI
,[44] Picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 33 (2017) 713–724. | DOI | Zbl
,[45] Picture 2-tuple linguistic Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19 (2017) 997–1010. | DOI | MR
,[46] A linear assignment method for multiple criteria decision analysis with hesitant fuzzy sets based on fuzzy measure. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19 (2017) 607–614. | DOI | MR
, , and ,[47] Picture 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Soft Comput. 22 (2018) 989–1002. | DOI | Zbl
, , and ,[48] Projection models for multiple attribute decision making with picture fuzzy information. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 9 (2018) 713–719. | DOI
, , and ,[49] Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 33 (2017) 1129–1142. | DOI | Zbl
, , , and ,[50] A SD-IITFOWA operator and TOPSIS based approach for MAGDM problems with intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 21 (2015) 28–47. | DOI
,[51] Large-scale building energy efficiency retrofit: concept, model and control. Energy 109 (2016) 456–465. | DOI
, and ,[52] Fuzzy linguistic induced generalized OWA qperator and its application in fuzzy linguistic decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 31 (2016) 749–762. | DOI
, and ,[53] ANP model for sustainable Building Energy Efficiency Retrofit (BEER): using Energy Performance Contracting (EPC) for hotel buildings in China. Habitat Int. 37 (2013) 104–112. | DOI
and ,[54] Sustainable building energy efficiency retrofit for hotel buildings using EPC mechanism in China: analytic Network Process (ANP) approach. J. Cleaner Product. 107 (2015) 378–388. | DOI
, , , and ,[55] On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 18 (1988) 183–190. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[56] An extended TODIM approach with intuitionistic linguistic numbers. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 25 (2018) 781–805. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[57] Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8 (1965) 338–353. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[58] Location selection of offshore wind power station by consensus decision framework using picture fuzzy modelling. J. Cleaner Product. 202 (2018) 980–992. | DOI
, , , and ,[59] Energy performance contracting in a competitive environment. Decis. Sci. 48 (2017) 723–765. | DOI
, and ,Cité par Sources :