Literature concerning about the supply chain management problem is usually based on perfect rationality. However, risk preferences have been proved to be an important role which influences managers’ decisions significantly. This paper investigates a risk combination problem under supplier encroachment with different risk preferences players. Assuming that the supply chain players may be risk-averse, risk-neutral and risk-taking, we build a Stackelberg game model to explore the optimal decisions and the impact of different risk combinations, respectively. We focus on two scenarios: the consumers perceive uniform quality between the two channels and perceive differentiated quality between the two channels. We find that the retailer always prefers a risk-averse supplier, while the supplier always prefers a risk-taking retailer. But the combination of a risk-averse supplier and a risk-taking retailer is not always beneficial to the whole supply chain. Further, we conduct numerical experiments to explore the risk combinations and the impacts of players’ selfish, aggressive and altruistic behaviors on optimal decisions.
Accepté le :
Première publication :
Publié le :
DOI : 10.1051/ro/2019038
Mots-clés : Supply chain management, supplier encroachment, risk preferences, Stackelberg game
@article{RO_2020__54_4_1057_0,
author = {Chen, Ping and Li, Bo and Huang, Huafei},
title = {Decision policies on players{\textquoteright} different risk combination under supplier encroachment},
journal = {RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Op\'erationnelle},
pages = {1057--1075},
publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
volume = {54},
number = {4},
year = {2020},
doi = {10.1051/ro/2019038},
mrnumber = {4100700},
language = {en},
url = {http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2019038/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Chen, Ping AU - Li, Bo AU - Huang, Huafei TI - Decision policies on players’ different risk combination under supplier encroachment JO - RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle PY - 2020 SP - 1057 EP - 1075 VL - 54 IS - 4 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2019038/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2019038 LA - en ID - RO_2020__54_4_1057_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Chen, Ping %A Li, Bo %A Huang, Huafei %T Decision policies on players’ different risk combination under supplier encroachment %J RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle %D 2020 %P 1057-1075 %V 54 %N 4 %I EDP-Sciences %U http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2019038/ %R 10.1051/ro/2019038 %G en %F RO_2020__54_4_1057_0
Chen, Ping; Li, Bo; Huang, Huafei. Decision policies on players’ different risk combination under supplier encroachment. RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 54 (2020) no. 4, pp. 1057-1075. doi : 10.1051/ro/2019038. http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2019038/
[1] , and , Risk tolerance and a retailer’s pricing and ordering policies within a newsvendor framework. Omega 40 (2012) 188–198. | DOI
[2] , , , , Thinking Coherently. Risk 10 (1997) 68–71.
[3] , and , The bright side of supplier encroachment. Marketing Sci. 26 (2007) 651–659. | DOI
[4] , and , The effect of risk sensitivity on a supply chain of mobile applications under a consignment contract with revenue sharing and quality investment. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 168 (2015) 31–40. | DOI
[5] , and , Newsvendor “Pull-to-Center” effect: adaptive learning in a laboratory experiment. Manuf. Ser. Oper. Manage. 10 (2008) 590–608. | DOI
[6] and , The impact of alternative performance measures on single-period inventory policy. J. Ind. Manage. Optim. 2 (2006) 297–318. | DOI | MR | Zbl
[7] , and , Testing a model of reasoned risk-taking: governance, the experience of principals and agents, and global strategy in high-technology IPO firms. Strategic Manage. J. 24 (2003) 803–820. | DOI
[8] , and , Product line extensions and technology licensing with a strategic supplier. Prod. Oper. Manage. 25 (2016) 1121–1146. | DOI
[9] , and , Direct marketing, indirect profits: a strategic analysis of dual-channel supply-chain design. Manage. Sci. 49 (2003) 1–20. | DOI | Zbl
[10] , Impacts of retailer’s risk averse behaviors on quick response fashion supply chain systems. Ann. Oper. Res. 268 (2018) 1–19. | MR
[11] , , and , Channel coordination in supply chains with agents having mean-variance objectives. Omega 36 (2008) 565–576. | DOI
[12] , , and , Store brand introduction in a two-echelon logistics system with a risk-averse retailer. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 90 (2016) 69–89. | DOI
[13] and , Price delegation and salesforce contract design with asymmetric risk aversion coefficient of sales agents. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 172 (2016) 31–42. | DOI
[14] , Performance of weather-conditional rebates under different risk preferences. Omega 41 (2013) 1053–1067. | DOI
[15] , and , Quality in supply chain encroachment. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 18 (2015) 280–298. | DOI
[16] , , and , Return policy model of supply chain management for single-period products. J. Optim. Theory App. 129 (2006) 293–308. | DOI | MR | Zbl
[17] , , and , Analysis of two-echelon supply chains with risk-bias participators. In Vol. 2 of International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA). IEEE (2008) 621–625.
[18] and , Operational strategies for supplier and retailer with risk preference under VMI contract. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 169 (2015) 413–421. | DOI
[19] and , Risk-averse and risk-taking newsvendors: a conditional expected value approach. Rev. Manage. Sci. 1 (2007) 93–110. | DOI
[20] and , Risk preferences and robust inventory decisions. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 118 (2009) 269–274. | DOI
[21] , and , Supplier encroachment under asymmetric information. Manage. Sci. 60 (2013) 449–462. | DOI
[22] , , and , Dual-channel supply chain decisions under asymmetric information with a risk-averse retailer. Ann. Oper. Res. 257 (2017) 423–447. | DOI | MR
[23] and , Coordinating a supply chain with risk-averse agents under demand and consumer returns uncertainty. Math. Prob. Eng. 2013 (2013) 289572. | MR | Zbl
[24] , and , Pricing strategies of a dual-channel supply chain with risk aversion. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 90 (2016) 108–120. | DOI
[25] , , , and , The newsvendor problem: Review and directions for future research. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 213 (2011) 361–374. | DOI | MR | Zbl
[26] , Coordinating a two-level supply chain with risk-averse preferences based on revenue-sharing contractIn: Control Conference, CCC 27th 2008. IEEE, Chinese (2008) 774–779. | DOI
[27] and , Optimization of Conditional Value-at-risk. J. Risk 2 (2000) 21–41. | DOI
[28] and , Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Manage. Sci. 46 (2000) 404–420. | DOI | Zbl
[29] and , Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Acad. Manage. Rev. 17 (1992) 9–38. | DOI
[30] , and , Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Acad. Manage. J. 48 (2005) 346–357. | DOI
[31] , New Level of Competition: When a Supplier gets into its Customers’ Business. New York Times (2005).
[32] and , Risk-averse newsvendor model with strategic consumer behavior. J. Appl. Math. 2013 (2013) 636259. | DOI | MR
[33] , and , Two-person knapsack game. J. Ind. Manage. Optim. 6 (2010) 847–860. | DOI | MR | Zbl
[34] , , and , Quality investment and price decision in a risk-averse supply chain. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 214 (2011) 403–410. | DOI | MR | Zbl
[35] , Governance-knowledge fit and strategic risk taking in supply chain digitization. Decis. Support Syst. 62 (2014) 54–65. | DOI
[36] , and , Diversification strategy with random yield suppliers for a mean¨Cvariance risk-sensitive manufacturer. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 90 (2016) 90–107. | DOI
[37] , , and , Stackelberg game of buyback policy in supply chain with a risk-averse retailer and a risk-averse supplier based on CVaR. PloS one 9 (2014) e104576. | DOI
Cité par Sources :
