In this paper, a linear programming (LP) model for measuring the relative efficiency of a decision-making unit (DMU) under inter-temporal dependence of data is proposed. Necessary and sufficient conditions are derived for identification of dynamically efficient paths. Furthermore, an LP model is proposed to estimate the super-efficiency of the dynamically efficient paths using an extended version of the modified MAJ model (Saati et al., Ric. Oper. 31 (2001) 47–59). To evaluate the applicability of the proposed method in a banking sector example, this method is employed for ranking some branches of the Iranian commercial bank.
Mots-clés : Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), ranking DMUs, efficiency, super-efficiency, inter-temporal dependence
@article{RO_2020__54_5_1385_0, author = {Moonesian, Vahid and Jahangiri, Saeid and Ghobadi, Saeid}, title = {Efficiency and super-efficiency under inter-temporal dependence}, journal = {RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Op\'erationnelle}, pages = {1385--1400}, publisher = {EDP-Sciences}, volume = {54}, number = {5}, year = {2020}, doi = {10.1051/ro/2019072}, mrnumber = {4127959}, language = {en}, url = {http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2019072/} }
TY - JOUR AU - Moonesian, Vahid AU - Jahangiri, Saeid AU - Ghobadi, Saeid TI - Efficiency and super-efficiency under inter-temporal dependence JO - RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle PY - 2020 SP - 1385 EP - 1400 VL - 54 IS - 5 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2019072/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2019072 LA - en ID - RO_2020__54_5_1385_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Moonesian, Vahid %A Jahangiri, Saeid %A Ghobadi, Saeid %T Efficiency and super-efficiency under inter-temporal dependence %J RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle %D 2020 %P 1385-1400 %V 54 %N 5 %I EDP-Sciences %U http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2019072/ %R 10.1051/ro/2019072 %G en %F RO_2020__54_5_1385_0
Moonesian, Vahid; Jahangiri, Saeid; Ghobadi, Saeid. Efficiency and super-efficiency under inter-temporal dependence. RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 54 (2020) no. 5, pp. 1385-1400. doi : 10.1051/ro/2019072. http://archive.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2019072/
[1] Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 140 (2002) 249–265. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[2] A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manag. Sci. 39 (1993) 1261–1294. | DOI | Zbl
and ,[3] Ranking units and determining dominance relations in the cost efficiency analysis, RAIRO: OR 49 (2015) 879–896. | DOI | Numdam | MR
, and ,[4] “Relative Efficiency Analysis’’, Unpublished Manuscript (A 1987 Version Appeared as a Working Paper, Schools of Urban and Public Affairs, Carnegie-millon University) (1987).
and ,[5] Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978) 429–444. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[6] Data envelopment analysis (DEA)-thirty years on. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 192 (2009) 1–17. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[7] Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications. Kluwer Academic Publisher, References and DEA-Solver Software (1999). | Zbl
, and ,[8] An improved approach to find and rank BCC-efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis (DEA). J. Ind. Syst. Eng. 10 (2017) 25–34.
and ,[9] A new DEA approach to fully rank DMUs with an application to MBA programs. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 27 (2020) 1886–1910. | DOI
and ,[10] An alternative DEA measure: A case of OECD countries. Appl. Econ. Lett. 10 (2003) 779–782. | DOI
,[11] Performance Measurement with Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis. Springer (2014). | DOI
and ,[12] A mathematical model for dynamic efficiency using data envelopment analysis. Appl. Math. Comput. 160 (2005) 363–378. | Zbl
and ,[13] Measurement of productivity index with dynamic DEA. Int. J. Oper. Res. 8 (2010) 247–260. | DOI | Zbl
and ,[14] A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016. J. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 61 (2018) 4–8. | DOI
and ,[15] Reviewing the literature on non-parametric dynamic efficiency measurement: State-of-the-art. J. Product. Anal. 41 (2014) 51–67. | DOI
, and ,[16] Intertemporal Production Frontiers: With Dynamic DEA. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands (1996).
and ,[17] Common weights in dynamic network DEA with goal programming approach for performance assessment of insurance companies in Iran. Manag. Res. Rev. 41 (2018) 920–938. | DOI
, , , and ,[18] A generalized DEA model for inputs (outputs) estimation under inter-temporal dependence. RAIRO: OR 53 (2019) 1791–1805. | DOI | Numdam | MR | Zbl
,[19] A dynamic DEA model for resource allocation, Int. J. Math. Oper. Res. (in press). | MR
,[20] Dynamic inverse DEA in the presence of fuzzy data. Adv. Environ. Biol. 8 (2014) 139–151.
, , and ,[21] Efficiency measure under inter-temporal dependence. Int. J. Technol. Decis. Mak. 17 (2018) 657–675. | DOI
, , and ,[22] An integrated model for slack-based measure of super-efficiency in additive DEA. Omega 67 (2016) 160–167. | DOI
, and ,[23] Benchmarking with network DEA in a fuzzy environment. RAIRO: OR 53 (2019) 687–703. | DOI | Numdam | MR | Zbl
,[24] A review of ranking models in data envelopment analysis. J. Appl. Math. 2013 (2013) 1–20. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , , , and ,[25] Multicriteria approaches for ranking of efficient units in DEA models. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 20 (2012) 435–449. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[26] Using monte carlo method for ranking efficient DMUs. Appl. Math. Comput. 162 (2005) 371–379. | MR | Zbl
, , and ,[27] Fair ranking of the decision making units using optimistic and pessimistic weights in data envelopment analysis. RAIRO: OR 51 (2017) 253–260. | DOI | Numdam | MR | Zbl
, and ,[28] Inverse DEA under inter-temporal dependence using multiple-objective programming. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 240 (2015) 447–456. | DOI | MR
, and ,[29] On the pareto (dynamically) efficient paths. Int. J. Comput. Math. 83 (2006) 629–633. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[30] Dynamic super-efficiency interval data envelopment analysis. In: 10th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE) (2015) 213–218.
, , , and ,[31] A complete efficiency ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis. Comput. Optim. Appl. 14 (1999) 261–266. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[32] Dynamic data envelopment analysis: Modeling intertemporal behavior of a firm in the presence of productive inefficiencies. Econ. Lett. 64 (1999) 51–56. | DOI | Zbl
, ,[33] New model for ranking DMUs in DDEA as a special case. Int. J. Ind. Math. 7 (2015) 1–6.
,[34] A model for ranking decision making units in data envelopment analysis. Ric. Oper. 31 (2001) 47–59.
, , and ,[35] Dynamics of Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory of System Efficiency. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, London (1995). | DOI | Zbl
,[36] Returns to scale in dynamic DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 16 (2005) 536–544. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[37] Duality classification and slacks in data envelopment analysis. Ann. Oper. Res. 66 (1996) 109–138. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[38] On finding the most BCC-efficient DMU: A new integrated MIP–DEA model. Appl. Math. Model. 36 (2012) 5515–5520. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[39] Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. Omega 38 (2010) 145–156. | DOI
and ,[40] Dynamic DEA with network structure: A slacksbased measure approach. Omega 42 (2014) 124–131. | DOI
and ,[41] Integrating slacks-based measure of efficiency and super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Omega 85 (2019) 156–165. | DOI
, , , and ,[42] Commonweights for fully ranking decision making units by regression analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (2011) 9122–9128. | DOI
, and ,[43] Merging decision-making units under inter-temporal dependence. IMA J. Manag. Math. 31 (2020) 139–166. | MR | Zbl
and ,Cité par Sources :